Church
Name: St. Chrysostom’s Episcopal Church
Church
Address: 1424 N. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL, 60610
Date
Attended: Sunday, October 30, 2016
Church
Category: More liturgical
Describe
the worship service you attended. How was it similar to or different from your
regular context?
The church I
regularly attend is Wellspring Alliance Church[1].
Racially, the congregation is fairly evenly split between Asian[2]
and White. Most of the congregants are young or middle-aged. It is a
Protestant, Christian Missionary Alliance Church. Our services typically
consist of worship through “contemporary” Christian music, prayer, a sermon,
and closing worship.
St.
Chrysostom’s, on the other hand, is an Episcopalian church. The majority of
congregants are white and over the age of 50. Aside from the sermon, the entire
worship service was printed out pamphlets, which were sitting in a basket at
the entrance of the worship hall. Musically, we worshiped the Lord through
hymns and German and Latin choir songs.
The worship
hall itself was very aesthetically pleasing, full of bright colors, carvings
and paintings depicting various scenes from the Bible, Latin symbols, and so
on. This was very different from my
typical context, which contains very few (if any) works of art. I found myself
wishing that I knew more about Episcopalian symbolism and art in order to more
fully appreciate the beauty of the place.
What did
you find most interesting or appealing about the worship service?
There were
two things that surprised me about the service.
The first
was that at one point during the service the liturgy reader listed off the
names of all of the people who had died from gun violence in the city over the
past week. Once this listing was done, the congregants spoke the names of
people who had been missed, and wel had a moment of silence. This was extremely
interesting to me – I expected the church, being liturgical, to be highly
conservative and somewhat isolated from its surroundings. This practice, along
with a prayer for Standing Rock Reservation, the high number of females and
racial minorities given the mic, and various aspects of the sermon shattered my
stereotype of liturgical churches; it was evident that St. Chrysostom’s was not
a “Noah’s Ark” church, but rather quite aware of and engaged in its
surroundings.
The second
was Communion. We all came up to the front of the worship hall, got on our
knees, and were given the elements by
the elders. That is, the bread was placed in our hands, and we all drank out of
the same cup, which was brought to our lips by the server. I absolutely loved
this – it reminded me of my status as a child
of God, receiving his sacrifice not by my own power, but by the agency of
Christ.
What did
you find most disorienting or challenging about the worship service?
I was
certainly made aware of my status as an “outsider” several times throughout the
service. At Wellspring, everything that we are supposed to say and do is either
spoken by the pastor or projected onto the screen in front of the congregation.
At St. Chrysostom’s, however, there were times when the congregants spoke
memorized words which were not printed in the pamphlet, which Leya and I
mumbled through together. Everyone knew when to stand and when to sit without
being told, whereas I clumsily dropped my notebook, phone, and pen several
times throughout the service attempting keep up with everybody. I also had a
difficult time with the hymnal, desperately paging through it to find the
correct tune before the rest of the congregation began singing.
All in all,
most of my difficulties with this church sprang from my unfamiliarity with its
worship style. If I attended St. Chrysostom’s more frequently and studied
Episcopalianism more thoroughly, I probably would not have had as hard of a
time.
What
aspects of Scripture or theology did the worship service illuminate for you
that you had not perceived as clearly in your regular context?
Much of the sermon was
centered on Sister Emmanuel, a missionary who was known for her impassioned
money-gathering efforts (for Christian missions, of course). There was a
passive reference to Zacchaeus toward the end, but overall, Sister Emmanuel was
the main subject. This struck me as unusual because my regular pastor grounds
his sermons in the stories of biblical figures such as David, Daniel, Ruth,
Peter, and so on, only making passive references to contemporary non-biblical
figures.
I liked
this, because it seemed to acknowledge more directly the work of the Spirit in
today’s world. It gave me a greater sense of involvement with the historical
and contemporary church – after all, biblical figures and modern-day Christians
are only human, and I believe the work of God and the Son should be seen and acknowledged
in both.
[1]
In my previous blog
entry, I referred to the church I regularly attend as Blanchard Alliance Church.
We recently changed our name to Wellspring Alliance Church, to reflect the
merged congregations of Living Water Alliance Church and Blanchard Alliance
Church.
[2]
Ethnically, the
Asian population is made up of foreign-born Korean, Vietnamese, and Chinese
members, in addition to Korean-Americans, Chinese-Americans,
Japanese-Americans, and Filipino-Americans.
No comments:
Post a Comment